As
is abundantly clear following the discussion of the previously posted alternative
therapies, further research is necessary before clear statements can be made
regarding the efficacy of such treatments. Though research studies in the area
of alternative treatments in ADHD cases are plentiful, many are riddled with
inconsistencies, short trial periods, small subject sizes or non-standardized
assessment tools. In addition, possible harmful or negative side effect
profiles of each alternative treatment were not explored extensively in this
paper. These factors call into question
many of the positive benefits initially observed and beg for clearer and more
convincing evidence before they can be called valid and efficacious treatment
alternatives. Further, though these therapies may provide slightly better
options for children with ADHD when compared to psychiatric medications, most
fulfill the same function of symptom management rather than addressing the root
cause of the cognitive and behavioral components at hand. Discussion of such
core factors, however, goes beyond the scope of this paper. The bottom line in
the investigation of alternative treatments in regard to the ADHD diagnosis is
the simple fact that multiple therapies have been tested, some positive
outcomes have been observed and there is extensive research still needed before
clear conclusions can be drawn in this field.
No comments:
Post a Comment